You have to feel what you write. What a strange
thing to stay. I have an odd feeling about that statement because I write to
escape feeling. What I desire most is to transcend my emotions. I don’t like my
emotions. Not all of them. I like feeling happy. Who doesn’t like feeling
happy? But happiness, which runs the gamut from intense euphoria to a mild
sense of well-being, is difficult to maintain, much less invoke. A lot of books
have been written on the subject but no one has yet discovered a sure fire method
for inducing a state of happiness at will. There are certain drugs that might
lead to a brief state of ecstasy or euphoria but when they wear off they leave
one feeling much worse than before one swallowed or injected the drug. Drugs
are not really a good solution.
If the rent is paid, the mortgage is amortized,
there’s food in the refrigerator, the water and electric bills are paid, one’s
work is agreeable, there is plenty of positive feedback from friends and
family, one’s health is good, and there’s freedom to do what one wants to do
whenever and however one chooses to do it, there’s a strong possibility that
something like happiness might be perpetuated for a respectable period of time.
Days, weeks, maybe even years. But these things are no guarantee of happiness.
A lot of people have such things in abundance and still feel unhappy much of
the time.
Happiness is an odd and elusive animal. But it is
only one among thousands of emotions, species unnamed, unrecognized that have
yet to prowl one’s nervous system and embed themselves in the heart. And really
there is no one single emotion. All emotions are blends. I have yet to meet
anyone who has felt a singularity of love without also feeling frustration,
confusion, bewilderment, betrayal, perplexity, urgency, adoration, turbulence,
intimidation, dread, triumph, mystery, discord, ambivalence, ambiguity,
temerity, endurance, effulgence, effrontery, excitement, derangement, and lust.
What I feel most of the time is anguish. Dread,
anxiety, worry, disillusion, remorse. These are not pleasant things to feel. If
these were the emotions that inspired me to write I’d be in real trouble.
But the fact is they are my main inspiration to
write. Because I write to get away from these feelings.
How does that work? I’m not sure. But I have some
theories.
First, language is a medium without limit. As soon
as I enter into the field of composition I feel an expansion, a dilation of
being. I feel the joy of limitless expansion.
There is also a very satisfying feeling in seeing
one’s nebulous inner turmoil crystallize in the regenerative pharmacology of
language. Words have a wonderful way of making one feel a little more distanced
from inner discomfort. And if one is writing out of a sudden ecstasy, words
make it shine back in the pellucid jewelry of linguistic abstractions. The very
word ‘ecstasy’ is pertinent to the business of writing. Ecstasy comes from
Greek ekstasis, “standing outside oneself.”
This is
precisely what writing does: it leads us outside of ourselves.
Writing
is a form of pharmacology. It has healing properties. And these properties are
based on a principle of combinatorial process. Diverse elements are mingled
together to create a symbol, an idea, an image. Language is inherently,
strongly associative. Its actions are primarily chemical in nature, drawing on
a dynamic of dissolution, distillation, and sublimation. Writing is
synergistic. Emotion ceases to be a static condition. Feelings flow. Vary,
fluctuate, metamorphose. Heraclitus goes floating by in an inner tube.
Ultimately,
what is felt in the pursuit of escaping one’s feeling is another feeling. A
bigger feeling. The feeling of sublimation. As one moves from a feeling of
stubborn solidity to a state of vapory abstraction one feels the euphoria of
displacement. Of buoyant reflection. One can feel the grip of an emotion loosen
as soon as one begins to reflect on the feeling. Or out of that feeling. It’s
not a position of ‘on’ so much as a position of disposition, the consciousness
of being in relation to other things.
No
emotion feels the same after a deepened analysis. It becomes less substantial,
less imprisoning. It becomes a pale mist of tingling sensation. It drifts in
reverie. It becomes an energy, a buoyancy that leads to music. A warm immersion
in water, a narcotic camaraderie in a copper California night. Equations of
sugar. Quakes of anarchical joy. An ecstasy of arroyos and turquoise auroras. The
glide through an ocean of words variable as waves on a sweet Pacific tongue.
4 comments:
When I was 27 and miserable much of the time--doing menial work, living in a Stygian dumbwaiter, smoking and drinking too much, watching too many movies--I found Bertrand Russell's The Conquest of Happiness in a junk shop. It was a help. The central idea: the less preoccupied with yourself you are--the more preoccupied with external objects you are--the happier you are. In other words, you become happy by standing outside yourself.
Sounds like you've had a career trajectory similar to mine. But yes, absolutely, I agree with Russell completely on that note. Russell would've liked the work of French poet Francis Ponge who concentrated all of his prose poems on descriptions of objects: soap, wine, radio, fruit box, insects, animals, you name it.
very nice blog more information our sites
Motorcycle tube manufacturer india
very nice blog more information our sites
Motorcycle tube manufacturer india
Post a Comment