“The
world belongs to those who do not feel,” writes Fernando Pessoa. I know
immediately what he means, but I need to explain it. It's a provocative phrase
and can be answered multiple ways. The first question to ask is why would lack
of feeling favor ownership of the world whereas depth or intensity of feeling
would discourage possession of the world?
I’m
not going to be very Buddhist about answering this. I’m going to be extremely
judgmental. People who do not feel are
free to abuse, exploit, manipulate, mislead, seduce, lure, chisel and finesse
their way to getting want they want. A clear benefit of lacking feeling is a
wonderful freedom from remorse and its messy cousin, compassion. These people
are called sociopaths. In order to coax some level of emotional excitement into
their lives they have to do something cruel and sadistic. William Shakespeare
wrote a good play about this behavior called Richard III. Other examples include the movie Wall Street, fashion guru Miranda Priestley (The Devil Wears Prada) and the current president of the United
States.
And
his entire cabinet. Whatever cabinet that happens to be this week.
Doesn’t
matter. It’s not likely an altruistic, self-effacing, self-sacrificing guy like
Jimmy Stewart is going to show up any time soon and make an exception to my
generalization. Power is a very large magnet for sociopaths. It draws
everything from war criminals to real estate moguls.
People
with feelings have a much harder time in this world. Not only do they not want
to own the world, they want out of the world.
Feelings
are big mushy things to carry around. They’re a burden. Sometimes you can
deaden them with booze and/or oxycontin or jack them up into a nice euphoric
blur with coke or meth, but mostly they just slop around in the brain reminding
you what a self-occupied, narcissistic jerk you are.
Feelings
are multi-layered. They’re onions. They keep peeling away until tears come and
the eyes sting. Feelings aren’t blithe paper airplanes we can send shooting
through the air. They come with complications. Ethical considerations. Moral
dilemmas. Guilt. Remorse. That stuff.
“If
man really felt,” Pessoa continues, “there would be no civilization. Art gives
shelter to the sensibility that action was obliged to forget. Art is
Cinderella, who stayed at home because that’s how it had to be.”
If
you want to avoid feeling get busy and do something. Wash the dishes. Mop the
floor. Look for a job. And if you already have a job, work overtime. Throw
yourself into it. And if you’re in the military, clean your gun. Play a card
game. Montage your gear.
But
if you’re curious about what’s in there, what’s lurking beneath your skin,
whatever it is that makes your heart beat faster or clouds your brain with ugly
black swirling clouds of despair, sit down in a chair and let it happen. Let it
be. Let it emerge. Bubble up from the miasma.
Happiness?
Sure. That happens occasionally. I don’t know what it is; a moment of
well-being? I don’t know. But I don’t think I’ve ever felt a single feeling
that wasn’t a blend, a mélange of contradictory ideas and attitudes.
Pessoa
again: “Every man of action is basically cheerful and optimistic, because those
who don’t feel are happy.”
Well,
you argue, isn’t feeling happy a feeling? You could say that, yes. But it’s not
what he means. Happiness is that delightfully buoyant feeling of not having any
feeling. It’s helium, not water. Water coming out of a tap is one thing. Wading
into the ocean is something else entirely.
Back
in the day we used to say “heavy, man,” if somebody said something significant.
Something significant generally sparked some deep feelings. Deep feelings are
heavy.
Anger
is an odd emotion. It feels more like energy than mass. Dark energy, to be
sure, but accelerant, gasoline, diesel, kerosene, butane. Anger can get you
into trouble really quick. It’s a mad brahma bull kicking at the chute.
Despair
is a tough one. That one can swallow you whole. It’s a black ugly hole. Your
best way out is to go all the way in. Lean into it. The more you allow it to
come into being the easier it becomes to live with. But don’t listen to me. I’m
not Eckhart Tolle or Pamela Chodron. I meant it when I said I’m not a Buddhist.
I’m judgmental. Being judgmental is like washing a big piece of cake down with
a vanilla shake when you’ve got diabetes.
So
why do I do it? Don’t ask me. I just live here.
I
like to put my fingers on the warm pages of a book and feel the world that way
sometimes. Words have a greater presence when they’re tangible. Of course, it’s
not the words that are tangible, the words are on the surface, ink, it’s the
medium that has tangibility, the book, the magazine, the texture of a journal
in the hands, the weight of an anthology. It’s the medium that makes the words
seem palpable. Words on a computer screen are never anything but digits and
algorithms, ghostly pixels in a world of electronic circuitry. The laptop on my
legs right now is warm and tangible, but it does not have the feeling of a
book. Why is that? Why should a book feel real and a computer feel…what? I
don’t know what to call the feeling of the computer. It’s warm. I worry about
the electromagnetic energy. I could say it’s got a pulse. It’s living. A book
is a tree that once lived. But the book isn’t living. The computer is, in some
way, actually living. I’m not being fair. Being judgmental has its hazards.
Why
do we want things? Desire is the center around which everything turns. And is
never satisfied. Never. The constant need for attention, the fear of seeing
things decay, disappear, the continuous adjustments that must be made to adapt
to a world in constant evolution, growth and decline, decline and growth. This
is the fascination of the swamp. These places of teeming, fetid life, of
drifting, miasmic odors where rare and delicate orchids grow. And the eye of an
alligator appears on the surface of the water, infinitely watchful, infinitely
alert.
The
world belongs to no one. That’s the biggest mistake humans ever made. The
notion that the world is there for our well-being, our kingdoms and odysseys,
our pleasures and sports, our thoughts and speeches. Our thoughts are nothing.
Our speeches are the chattering of birds.
But
there is also the sublime. Let’s consider that. There are sensitivities that
crave transcendence. That yearn for the ultimate well-being of non-being. That
wrestle oblivion. That fear the abyss. That dare to walk on a rope across a
canyon. That will spend a lifetime pursuing poetry in a society that cares only
about money, that judges everything against the gauge of money, that sees
everything as commodity, which is material that is bought and sold, which is
amazing as paint, as millions for a painting, a Pollock for $140 million,
bought by a Hollywood mogul. I find that baffling. And weirdly encouraging.
No comments:
Post a Comment