I
was born 66 years after Pat Garrett shot and killed Billy the Kid, 92 years
after the first edition of Whitman’s Leaves
of Grass appeared, and only 38 years after Geronimo died at age 79 at Fort
Sill hospital while still being held as a prisoner of war. The one thing these
dates have in common is that they are all under 100 years. I was closer in
history to Geronimo and Billy the Kid when I was born then I am now to myself
at age 5. My proximity to the nineteenth century doesn’t really surprise me.
I’ve always felt more at home there than I do now.
Which
isn’t really saying a lot. This is of consequence to me and nobody else, with the
possible exception of my peers. The upshot is that I relate more to a time of
small farms and open plains and creaking windmills than I do to tapping letters
on a laptop, watching rock musicians play electric guitars on YouTube and
entering a public space populated with zombies staring at tiny handheld
computers as they attempt to simultaneously drive cars and walk across busy
streets.
The
world I currently occupy is psychotic, violent and dying. There are
approximately 38 armed conflicts occurring in the world at present, including
Afghanistan, Syria, Nigeria, Somalia and Iraq. There had been approximately 1.2
million violent deaths in Iraq as of 2007. Statistics since then are disputable
and murky.
Not
that there weren’t any wars fought in the 19th century. But the
dizzying rise in human population has clearly contributed to an equally
dizzying maelstrom of bloodshed and struggle.
I’m
not trying to make anybody depressed by dwelling on these things, but you have
to wonder what the human experience has meant all these centuries and where
it’s going and does any of this have any real meaning in a universe so vast
that the nearest solar system to ours is 4.24 light years distant.
I
think about these things because my values and principles and habits feel more
like 19th century values and principles and habits than 21st
century values and principles and habits. The most salient of these being
books.
I
love books. A lot of other people love books but not nearly as many as 50, 40
or even just 10 years ago.
It’s
heartbreaking to visit a bookstore. I try to stay out of them. Heartbreaking to
see the inventories so eviscerated. Nothing quirky, nothing too obscure,
everything mainstream blockbusters, stacks of Dan Brown and Tom Clancy and J.K.
Rowling and Deepak Chakra, like the little bookstores in alcoves at the
airport. And even there I wonder how many are selling because on any of the
flights I’ve taken in the last few years – which were long ten-hour flights – I
saw only one person reading a book: me.
Years
ago when Bill Gates predicted that digital media would replace print media I
tried hard to deny it, but deep down I knew he was right. It is to the extent
that he was right, to the extent that people would drop reading books and
magazines altogether and obsessively use electronic gadgetry to play video
games, gossip on social media and watch YouTube videos (which I happen to enjoy
doing quite a bit myself), that I did not expect. I also hoped that it would
take much, much longer for people to give up the feel of a book in their hands,
the soft whisper of paper when a page turned and the intense commitment that
went into the editing and choosing a font, much less the intense concentration
and intellectual labor that goes into writing for a tangible, clear-cut
entity – for the permanence of ink
rather than the fickleness of pixels - and the immense difference that makes to
someone about to embark on a writing project. It affects one’s attitude deeply
when the stakes are that high. The level of earnestness goes way up. Writing
for print elevates the quality of attention one brings to crafting a sentence
or launching a provocative idea. It has become commonplace to stumble over
grammatical errors and gross misspellings when reading a body of work online.
Errors appear in books, but not nearly with the frequency as they do online.
Books insure quality. And the ideas they express are much harder to delete. Nor
is one surveilled, followed by algorithms or assaulted by ads while reading.
Books favor a private communion with language and the serene, uninterrupted
flow of ideas. How could they let that go?
But
let go they did. And the effect has been
devastating. Here’s what Chris Hedges has to say in his 2009 book Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and
the Triumph of Spectacle:
Hour after hour, day
after day, week after week, we are bombarded with the cant and spectacle put
out over the airwaves or over computer screens by highly-pain pundits,
corporate advertisers, talk-show hosts, and gossip-fueled entertainment
networks. And a culture dominated by images and slogans seduces those who are
functionally literate but who make the choice not tor ed. There have been other
historical periods with high rates of illiteracy and vast propaganda campaigns.
But not since the Soviet and fascist dictatorships, and perhaps the brutal
authoritarian control of the Catholic Church in the Middle Ages, has the
content of information been as skillfully and ruthlessly controlled and
manipulated. Propaganda has become a substitute for ideas and ideology.
Knowledge is confused with how we are made to feel. Commercial brands are
mistaken for expressions of individuality. And in this precipitous decline of
values and literacy, among those who cannot read and those who have given up
reading, fertile ground for a new totalitarianism is being seeded.
I
take seeds very seriously. They’re amazing. A tiny seed – a speck on the palm
of your hand – can house a sequoia that will one day grow to a ginormous
height, or produce a fragrant Ylang-Ylang in the rainforests of Asia. I think
of words as seeds: a small body of syllables with a little semantic latitude
can take root in the mind and grow into a novel or a manifesto, a prose poem or
a palace of ideas.
And
this is what makes me feel so 19th century. This isn’t 21st
century thinking. I’m not giving a TED talk or giving a seminar at a
corporation. I will be posting this at a blog, which is completely not what
I’ve been talking about (a healthy amount of cognitive dissonance has helped me
adapt to this world and its contradistinctions), but it will be like bringing
something from the first World Expo – The Great Exhibition of the Works of
Industry of All Nations as it was more formally called - held in the Crystal
Palace in Hyde Park, London in 1851 and setting it down on a table in 2019.
Say, The Mountain of Light, the world’s largest known diamond in 151, or one of
Samuel Colt’s Dragoon Revolvers. Because you can do that with words, create
worlds, diamonds, dragons, gyroscopic metaphors. The sky is the limit. And even
that’s not a limit. Because with a handful of letters I can make a limit
illimitable.
No comments:
Post a Comment