I find it both reassuring and somewhat dubious that at 78 I still harbor affections and enthusiasms that I enjoyed in my rebellious 20s. I’d be in a sorry state of deep remorse were it otherwise. Chief among these early affiliations is French symbolism, followed quickly by Surrealism, Dada, Marcel Duchamp, hypnopompic kabuki and the circumference of insanity. I had a special appetite for the work of Stephane Mallarmé, which was unabashedly difficult, and playful and sly and erotic and prodigiously self-propagating. My temperament matched Baudelaire’s antagonistic fillips to the inane and vacuous presumptions of bourgeois sanctimony. He had a genius for finding beauty in squalor and luxury in stark privation. He prepared me, at age 18, for the visionary deliriums of Rimbaud, whose defection from poetry for the louche commerce of guns and coffee in East Africa came as a big disappointment and an unending state of perplexity. Why? Why would anyone deny expression to the genius inhabiting them?
I
believe the denial of the poet in Rimbaud for the pursuit of normalcy had
lethal consequences. I believe it also accounts for Rimbaud’s evident
dromomania. Even his brief flirtation with photography.
It
wasn’t until I was much older that the lush orchestrations of Mallarmé’s poetry
and prose poetry began to hold a certain fascination for me. He wasn’t as
overtly exciting as Rimbaud’s psychedelic Illuminations, with their colorful
imagery and robust deliriums, or Baudelaire’s dazzling sensuality, his silken
orgies and gleaming boa constrictors and vague perfumes, but I find a deeply
abiding intellectual stimulation in my Mallarméan immersions, a feeling of
inner liberation, of unfathomable hungers and chance encounters. I’m drawn to
the intense musicality of Mallarmé’s work, his subtle and tortured syntax, his
fragmented phrasing and abrupt non-sequiturs, his ability to imbue the power of
language with the vivid presence of the void.
Stephane
Mallarmé's prose poems define the indefinable with a nimble fracturing of
banality. The tight grip of academic rhetoric. It's one thing to deliberately
obfuscate a point for the appearance of sophistication and another to
reorganize perception altogether.
Today's
banalities apparently gain in profundity if one states that the wisdom of the
past, for all its virtues, belongs to the past. The arrogance of those who come
later preens itself with the notion that the past is dead and gone. The modern
mind can no longer think thought, only can locate it in time and space. The
activity of thinking decays to the passivity of classifying.
Wrote
Russell Jacoby.
Russell
Jacoby famously coined the term "velvet prison" to describe the
intellectual stagnation of academics who are insulated and complacent within
the university system, leading to a situation where "the past is
forgotten, it rules unchallenged". He argued that this institutional
comfort breeds an intellectual decline, making it difficult to think critically
or challenge the status quo.
States
the AI Overview on Google.
In
Book 20, Part Four of his autobiography, Dichtung und Wahrheit (Poetry
and Truth), Goethe describes the phenomenon of Dämonisch (the
daemonic) – which he attributed to the artistry of violinist Nicolas Paganini -
as a "mysterious power which everyone senses and no philosopher has
explained.” Lorca referred to this in his essay “Theory and Function of the
Duende,” where he describes the duende as a “power and not a behavior, it is a struggle
and not a concept. I have heard an old guitarist master say, ‘The duende is not
in the throat; the duende surges up from the soles of the feet.’ Which means
that it is not a matter of ability, but of real live form; of blood; of ancient
culture; of creative action.” It is not something anyone needs to go into debt
for at a university. “No,” Lorca continues, “the dark and quivering duende that I
am talking about is a descendent of the merry daemon of Socrates, all marble
and salt, who angrily scratched his master on the day he drank hemlock; a
descendant also of Descartes’ melancholy daemon, small as a green almond, who,
tired of lines and circles, went out along the canals to hear the drunken
sailors sing.”
My
first taste of duende occurred one summer afternoon in August, 1965, two months
after graduating from high school, in the backseat of a friend’s car, a speaker
in back of my head, Bob Dylan’s “Like A Rolling Stone” came blaring out, galvanizing me with its startling imagery. This prompted a search
for poetry that had the same wildness as Dylan’s lyrics. A professor at San José
City College revealed what I was looking for: “Le Bateau ivre,” “The
Drunken Boat,” by Arthur Rimbaud. This adventure eventually led to the poetry
of the beats, Ginsberg, Burroughs, Corso. Michael McClure. Philip Lamantia. Ed
Dorn’s Gunslinger. Bob Dylan’s Tarantula. André Breton’s Manifesto
of Surrealism.
I
aligned myself with the beats decades ago. I never liked hippies all that much.
Most of the ones I met were shallow and pretentious and somewhat theatrical;
many of them had enveloped themselves in the disarming gauze of a faux
innocence to challenge the dreary, soul-killing controls of capitalism, or
embedded themselves in fantastical Tolkienesque worlds weirdly superimposed
over the bitter realities of the industrial world. Many of them named their
children Rainbow and Moonbeam and danced like fairies in the moonlight. It’s
rather sad, what happened. And it happened so quickly. When the spartan
conditions of poverty inevitably soured to such an extent that the toxic
predations of wealth suddenly started looking attractive, the most vigorous of
these radicals were first in line for Reagan’s Good Morning America mode of
unbridled consumerism. Jerry Rubin became a stockbroker. Tom Hayden
transitioned into mainstream politics. I remember a lot of friends and
acquaintances suddenly working for corporations. They rationalized this move
easily with the phrase, “we can change things from the inside.” And how did
that work out? It’s little wonder Gen Z has so much contempt for boomers.
I
admired the beats for their intellect, their candor, their sense of adventure,
their embrace of Dada spontaneity, and their fearless and sometimes nihilistic,
sometimes Dharmic embrace of ways and means contrary to the delusional pursuits
of the American Dream highly unpopular in American culture, such as harboring
an openly adversarial position toward conformism and the kind of soulless,
bourgeois complacencies that have resulted in our current dystopic landscape.
Most
of the beats are dead now. Gary Snyder, who was a central figure not only to
beat culture but a strong advocate of wilderness preservation and ecological
health and integrity, as well as a highly disciplined practitioner of Zen, is
still alive, and still revered as a public figure, even in mainstream culture.
As of this writing, he is 95.
Snyder
wrote one of my all-time favorite poems. It’s titled “What You Should Know To
Be A Poet,” and is short enough to include here:
all you can about animals as persons.
the names of trees and flowers and weeds.
names of stars, and the movements of the planets
and
the moon.
your own six senses, with a watchful and elegant mind.
at least one kind of traditional magic:
divination, astrology, the book of changes, the tarot;
dreams.
the illusory demons and illusory shining gods;
kiss the ass of the devil and eat shit;
fuck his horny barbed cock,
fuck the hag,
and all the celestial angels
and
maidens perfum'd and golden–
& then love the human:
wives husbands and
friends.
children's games, comic books, bubble-gum,
the weirdness of television and advertising.
work, long dry hours of dull work swallowed and accepted
and livd with and finally lovd. exhaustion,
hunger,
rest.
the wild freedom of the dance, extasy
silent solitary illumination, entasy
real
danger. gambles. and
the edge of death.
I’m
99% on board with the recommendations of this poem. Everything. But one. The
“work, long dry hours of dull work swallowed and accepted / and livd with and
finally lovd. exhaustion, hunder, rest.” That part is utterly foreign to my
nature. I’ve had a lifetime of working long dry hours of dull work and hated
it. Love it? Are you frigging kidding me? Every job I ever had never served as
anything other than a source of money. End of the work shift, I felt like a
turd squeezed out of the sphincter of commerce. It added nothing to my life but
anguish, despair, and exhaustion. The nicest thing to ever happen to me was
retirement and social security. I was finally – in old age – able to have time
to create, reupholster my self-esteem, and do my writing.
Bu
the other stuff, about being a bad-ass passionate ecstatic shamanistic
visionary fucking fun-loving philosopher with one foot in hedonism and the
other foot in minstrelsy mischief and eccentric mystical phantasmagoric
pursuits is terrific advice. Nor do I see any of that as a job recommendation.
Poetry
was not an activity relegated to a quiet scholarly vocation, oak-paneled rooms,
leaded windows in ivy-covered towers, awards, retreats, lectures, sabbaticals,
academic panels and conferences, the polite society of the professoriate.
That’s were poetry turns curdled and careful and stylishly chic. Poetry – the
kind of poetry Snyder’s poem evokes - was the province of the desperado. The
gambler at the edge of death. King Lear’s sad, forbearing clown. Ophelia’s
lunatic rage against the abuses of fate. Hamlet’s scathing to be or not to be.
Charles Bukowski’s inebriated smile.
I
see the poet as a seasoned detective. The world is a crime scene. The human
spirit has been murdered. There’s no lack of suspects. No accountability
either, for the thousands upon thousands of zombies walking the streets, heads
bowed, faces expressionless, voices corralled by fear and censorship.
Marianne
Moore once defined poetry as “imaginary gardens with real toads in them.” But a
moment ago R shared a definition of poetry she saw on Facebook today, written
by a fourth grader: “poetry is an egg with a horse in it.”
That’s
brilliant. I can’t top that. All I can do is keep it warm, and wait for
something to hatch.

2 comments:
john, your essay encapsulates my own thinking of poetry just as you put it down here! i've been thinking tonight, as i was doing my weekly chores, after coming home from a long turgid day at work, that poetry is what makes me experience life in all its horror & beauty. & like you i discovered rimbaud around that same age, 18, & i knew that that is all i wanted in life. 100% agree that the poet is a 'seasoned detective' of this mad world. 'poetry is an egg with a horse in it'! precisely! no better definition of poetry can be found. as for work, the things we need to do for bread, okay, but i prefer whitman, 'i loaf & invite my soul'. oh, i bought a copy of Backscatter a couple of weeks ago in a used bookstore in Petaluma, CA. a most lucky find! cheers!
It does me good to hear you purchased a copy of Backscatter in Petaluma, of all places. In all my years in California, I never made it to Petaluma. But for some reason I often think about it. "Long turgid day at work" sounds all too familiar. Turgid. What a great word. It's doing great service here. If you ever make it to Seattle, there's a fantastic used bookstore in the U district called Magus. It's a typically old and somewhat floorboard-creaky kind of place with aromas of thought and contemplation mingled with incense. It's where I take books when I've completely run out of space to harbor them. Last time I sold them some box loads of books I came home with a copy of Du monde entier by Blaise Cendrars.
Post a Comment